Wei Wu v. Garland
Petitioner: XIAN WEI WU
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-666
Filed: April 14, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 3, 2025 WEI WU V. BONDI

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 15) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due November 17, 2023. The answering brief is due January 16, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/20/2023 02:41 PM]
September 15, 2023 Filing 15 MOTION to Extend Time to File Opening Brief filed by Petitioner Xian Wei Wu. [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:43 AM]
July 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 13) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due September 18, 2023. The answering brief is due November 17, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/31/2023 04:09 PM]
July 17, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Xian Wei Wu. [Entered: 07/18/2023 02:23 PM]
June 14, 2023 Filing 12 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Xian Wei Wu. [Entered: 06/21/2023 01:54 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 11 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/05/2023 06:15 AM]
May 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. Before: Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 9) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due June 9, 2023. The opening brief is due July 18, 2023. The answering brief is due September 18, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/11/2023 04:20 PM]
May 8, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/09/2023 04:40 PM]
April 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 04/28/2023 09:26 AM]
April 28, 2023 Filing 7 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/28/2023 07:22 AM]
April 18, 2023 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Mona Maria Yousif for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/18/2023 11:58 AM]
April 18, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mona Maria Yousif for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/18/2023 06:32 AM]
April 14, 2023 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/19/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 6/9/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/18/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 9/18/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:16 PM]
April 14, 2023 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/13/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-666 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:14 PM]
April 14, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:14 PM]
April 14, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:14 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Wei Wu v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: XIAN WEI WU
Represented By: Xian Wei Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Ms. Mona Maria Yousif
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?