Zheng v. Garland
ZHEN ZHENG |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
23-667 |
April 14, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Thankful Vanderstar representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/26/2023 10:00 AM] |
Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Respondent William Clark Minick for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/26/2023 09:59 AM] |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William Clark Minick for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Thankful Vanderstar. [Entered: 10/26/2023 09:55 AM] |
Filing 16 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Zhen Zheng is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 10/25/2023 03:45 PM] |
Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion to reinstate this petition for review (Docket Entry No. 12) is granted. The order of dismissal for failure to prosecute (Docket Entry No. 11) is vacated, the petition for review is reinstated, and the temporary stay of removal is restored. The Clerk will file the opening brief submitted at Docket Entry No. 14. The answering brief is now due November 27, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/24/2023 01:16 PM] |
Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Zhen Zheng. [Entered: 10/05/2023 10:00 AM] |
Filing 13 ORDER FILED. The motion to reinstate (Docket Entry No. 12) does not include the opening brief. See 9th Cir. Gen. Order 2.4. If the opening brief is submitted within 21 days of this order, the court will consider the motion to reinstate. If the opening brief is not submitted within 21 days of this order, the mandate will become effective. [Entered: 09/11/2023 09:23 AM] |
Filing 12 MOTION to Reinstate filed by Petitioner Zhen Zheng. [Entered: 08/25/2023 08:46 AM] |
Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Petitioner has failed to file the opening brief in this case. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 08/18/2023 11:41 AM] |
Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 06/09/2023 11:35 AM] |
Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/08/2023 08:43 AM] |
Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 05/01/2023 08:32 AM] |
Filing 7 FEE PAID by WinWin Immigration Services, check # 313 for $500.00, Reeipt #4709005751. [Entered: 04/24/2023 12:25 PM] |
Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Thankful Vanderstar for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/19/2023 07:35 AM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thankful Vanderstar for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/19/2023 04:56 AM] |
Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/19/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 6/9/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/18/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 9/18/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:28 PM] |
Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/13/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-667 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:26 PM] |
Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:25 PM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Zheng v. Garland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: ZHEN ZHENG | |
Represented By: | Zhen Zheng |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
Represented By: | Miss Thankful Vanderstar |
Represented By: | Mr. William Clark Minick |
Represented By: | Oil |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.