Torres Valdovinos v. Garland
Petitioner: MIRIAN DEL CARMEN TORRES VALDOVINOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-699
Filed: April 18, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 5, 2024 TORRES VALDOVINOS V. GARLAND

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2023 Filing 30 RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Monica Antoun. [Entered: 11/07/2023 07:00 AM]
November 3, 2023 Filing 29 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for March 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-699] [Entered: 11/03/2023 11:02 AM]
October 31, 2023 Filing 28 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 24 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 10/31/2023 11:13 AM]
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days (DE 26) granted. Amended briefing schedule: . Optional Reply Brief due 12/14/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/26/2023 02:16 PM]
October 26, 2023 Filing 26 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Mirian Del Carmen Torres Valdovinos. [Entered: 10/26/2023 01:28 PM]
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 24 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/24/2023 04:09 PM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 24 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/23/2023 11:38 AM]
September 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 22) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 10/25/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/18/2023 08:22 AM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 22 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/18/2023 06:11 AM]
August 29, 2023 Filing 21 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Elizabeth Robyn Chapman representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/29/2023 07:32 AM]
August 29, 2023 Filing 20 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Monica Antoun for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/29/2023 07:31 AM]
August 29, 2023 Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Monica Antoun for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Elizabeth Robyn Chapman. [Entered: 08/29/2023 05:31 AM]
August 29, 2023 Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Monica Antoun for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/29/2023 05:29 AM]
August 9, 2023 Filing 17 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Mirian Del Carmen Torres Valdovinos received. [Entered: 08/09/2023 02:13 PM]
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Mirian Del Carmen Torres Valdovinos is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/03/2023 01:37 PM]
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED.Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 14) for leave to file a late opening brief is granted. The Clerk will file the opening brief submitted on July 27, 2023 at Docket Entry No. 13. The answering brief is now due September 25, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/03/2023 11:15 AM] [Edited: 08/03/2023 11:21 AM]
July 27, 2023 Filing 14 MOTION to accept late filing filed by Petitioner Mirian Del Carmen Torres Valdovinos. [Entered: 07/27/2023 01:42 PM]
July 27, 2023 Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Mirian Del Carmen Torres Valdovinos. [Entered: 07/27/2023 01:41 PM]
July 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 11) denied. The request is late. The filer must file a motion per 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(b). [Entered: 07/25/2023 10:19 AM]
July 25, 2023 Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Mirian Del Carmen Torres Valdovinos. [Entered: 07/25/2023 07:36 AM]
June 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 06/07/2023 01:05 PM]
June 6, 2023 Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/06/2023 01:25 PM]
May 3, 2023 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 05/03/2023 08:21 AM]
April 19, 2023 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Elizabeth Robyn Chapman for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/19/2023 01:42 PM]
April 19, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth Robyn Chapman for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/19/2023 01:20 PM]
April 18, 2023 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/23/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 6/13/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/24/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 9/20/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/18/2023 03:49 PM]
April 18, 2023 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/18/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-699 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/18/2023 03:47 PM]
April 18, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/18/2023 03:46 PM]
April 18, 2023 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 3/20/2023. [Entered: 04/18/2023 03:46 PM]
April 18, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/18/2023 03:46 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Torres Valdovinos v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MIRIAN DEL CARMEN TORRES VALDOVINOS
Represented By: Ms. Destiny Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Monica Antoun
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Ms. Elizabeth Robyn Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?