County of San Diego v. USDC-CASD
| COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO |
| In re: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and FRANKIE GREER |
| 23-70005 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GABRIEL P. SANCHEZ) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners motion for a stay (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. DENIED. [12625262] (SVG) [Entered: 01/06/2023 07:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner County of San Diego EMERGENCY motion for stay pending decision. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/06/2023. [12624807] (BY) [Entered: 01/06/2023 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS WITH APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [12624800] (BY) [Entered: 01/06/2023 01:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
