Douglas Hirano v. USDC-HI
| DOUGLAS AKIRA HIRANO |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII |
| In re: DOUGLAS AKIRA HIRANO, KATE MCCLORY, SAND ISLAND TREATMENT CENTER, AT&T WIRELESS, RANDY LEE COOK, HOLIDAY INN HOTEL, WHITE SANDS HOTEL, SAND VILLA HOTEL, COCONUT WAIKIKI HOTEL, OHANA MALIA HOTEL, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN DOES, 1-200 and JANE ROES, 1-100 |
| 23-70157 |
| August 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail returned on 10/11/2023 addressed to Douglas Akira Hirano, re: [ # 3 ] Dispositive Order. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, not at this address. Resending to: 1707 Hoolaulea Street, Pearl City, HI 96782. [12809650]--[Edited: address updated. 10/16/2023 by SLM] (LA) [Entered: 10/13/2023 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (BRIDGET S. BADE, KENNETH K. LEE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) : Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition, as amended, is denied. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [12800199] (RT) [Entered: 09/27/2023 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Douglas Akira Hirano amended petition for writ of mandamus. Dated 08/15/2023. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12779394] (RL) [Entered: 08/23/2023 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PROSE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [12778530] (BY) [Entered: 08/22/2023 10:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
