Ani v. Garland
Petitioner: DANIEL TOCHUKWU ANI
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-785
Filed: April 27, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2023 Filing 24 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 11/06/2023 02:13 PM]
November 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion for voluntary dismissal (Docket Entry No. 22) is denied because the motion requests dismissal without prejudice. If petitioner seeks voluntary dismissal of this case, voluntary dismissal will be with prejudice, and petitioner will not be able to resume proceedings in this petition in the future, although petitioner will be able to file a new petition for review from any future final order of removal. Petitioner may file a renewed motion for voluntary dismissal requesting dismissal of this petition with prejudice at any time. The optional reply brief remains due on or before November 20, 2023. [Entered: 11/03/2023 11:14 AM]
October 30, 2023 Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Petitioner Daniel Tochukwu Ani. [Entered: 10/30/2023 02:47 PM]
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/30/2023 01:01 PM]
October 30, 2023 Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/30/2023 10:36 AM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 19 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Carlton Frederick Sheffield representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/18/2023 11:25 AM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Sarah Abigail Byrd [Entered: 09/18/2023 11:24 AM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Abigail Byrd for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Carlton Frederick Sheffield. [Entered: 09/18/2023 11:03 AM]
September 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 15 by Petitioner Daniel Tochukwu Ani is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/11/2023 03:32 PM]
August 30, 2023 Filing 15 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Daniel Tochukwu Ani.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief] [Entered: 08/30/2023 09:05 PM] [Edited: 09/11/2023 03:25 PM]
July 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 8/30/2023, Answering Brief Due 10/30/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/31/2023 04:31 PM]
July 31, 2023 Filing 13 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Daniel Tochukwu Ani. [Entered: 07/31/2023 03:49 PM]
June 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 06/09/2023 11:08 AM]
June 9, 2023 Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/09/2023 10:37 AM]
May 24, 2023 Filing 10 FEE PAID by Petitioner(s) Tochukwu Ani. Check number 108 - Receipt #4709005779. [Entered: 05/24/2023 02:55 PM]
May 19, 2023 Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 05/19/2023 08:05 AM]
May 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 05/04/2023 04:33 PM]
April 28, 2023 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Carlton Frederick Sheffield for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/28/2023 10:08 AM]
April 28, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carlton Frederick Sheffield for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/28/2023 04:58 AM]
April 27, 2023 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/1/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 6/22/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/31/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 9/29/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/27/2023 01:38 PM]
April 27, 2023 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/27/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-785 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/27/2023 01:36 PM]
April 27, 2023 Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 4/17/2023. [Entered: 04/27/2023 01:36 PM]
April 27, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/27/2023 01:36 PM]
April 27, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/27/2023 01:36 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ani v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DANIEL TOCHUKWU ANI
Represented By: Mr. Emmanuel Eke Enyinwa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Ms. Sarah Abigail Byrd
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Mr. Carlton Frederick Sheffield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?