Jack JordanIn re: Jack Jordan
| In re: JACK JORDAN, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: July 19, 2019 |
| 23-80007 |
| February 9, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): The court has been informed that Jack R. T. Jordan has been disbarred from the practice of law by the Kansas Supreme Court. Within 28 days of this order, respondent must either resign from the bar of this court or show cause in writing why he should not be reciprocally disbarred. See In re Kramer, 282 F.3d 721, 724 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. App. P. 46(b); 9th Cir. R. 46-2. If the court does not receive a timely response to this order, respondent will be removed from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice in this court without further notice. [12650627] (AF) [Entered: 02/10/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 Attorney discipline case docketed. [12649818] (BY) [Entered: 02/09/2023 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jack JordanIn re: Jack Jordan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: In re: JACK JORDAN, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: July 19, 2019 | |
| Represented By: | Jack Jordan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.