In re: Mitchell Wright
| In re: MITCHELL C. WRIGHT, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: March 27, 1997 |
| 23-80010 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): The court has been informed that Mitchell C. Wright has been suspended from the practice of law by the Nevada Supreme Court. Within 28 days of this order, respondent must either agree to a reciprocal suspension or show cause why such a suspension should not be imposed. See In re Kramer, 282 F.3d 721, 724 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. App. P. 46(b); 9th Cir. R. 46-2. If the court does not receive a timely response to this order, respondent will be removed from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice in this court without further notice. [12655856] (AF) [Entered: 02/17/2023 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 Attorney discipline case docketed. [12652514] (BY) [Entered: 02/14/2023 08:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Mitchell Wright | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: In re: MITCHELL C. WRIGHT, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: March 27, 1997 | |
| Represented By: | Mitchell C. Wright Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
