Virginia Abrogina v. Kentech Consulting, Inc.
| VIRGINIA ABROGINA, as an individual, and on behalf of the putative class |
| KENTECH CONSULTING, INC., a foreign corporation doing business in California |
| 23-80041 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 ENTRY UPDATED (DOCKETING LETTER ATTACHED). ORIGINAL TEXT: FILED ON 05/19/2023 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f). SERVED ON 05/19/2023. [12719798] [12719798]--[Edited 05/22/2023 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 05/22/2023 07:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Virginia Abrogina v. Kentech Consulting, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: VIRGINIA ABROGINA, as an individual, and on behalf of the putative class | |
| Represented By: | Devin Heng Fok |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: KENTECH CONSULTING, INC., a foreign corporation doing business in California | |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Mary Kushi Carter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
