John SchumIn re: John Schum
In re: JOHN SCHUM, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: April 9, 2014 |
23-80044 |
May 25, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The court has been informed that John Schum has been suspended from the practice of law by the California Supreme Court. Within 28 days of this order, respondent must either agree to a reciprocal suspension or show cause why such a suspension should not be imposed. See In re Kramer, 282 F.3d 721, 724 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed. R. App. P. 46(b); 9th Cir. R. 46-2. If the court does not receive a timely response to this order, respondent will be removed from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice in this court without further notice. [12723820] (OC) [Entered: 05/26/2023 04:40 PM] |
Filing 1 Attorney discipline case docketed. [12722887] (BY) [Entered: 05/25/2023 03:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: John SchumIn re: John Schum | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: In re: JOHN SCHUM, Esquire, Admitted to the Bar of the Ninth Circuit: April 9, 2014 | |
Represented By: | John Schum Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.