Lamya Brewster, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, CHARLIE BECK, Chief, individually, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, a public entity, CHARLIE BECK, Chief, in his official capacity and DOES 1 THROUGH 10 |
| LAMYA BREWSTER, individually and as class representative, ELIAS ARIZMENDI, individually and as class representatives and JULIAN VIGIL, individually and as class representatives |
| 23-80067 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 ENTRY UPDATED (DOCKETING LETTER ATTACHED). ORIGINAL TEXT: FILED ON 07/31/2023 PETITION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL PURSUANT TO RULE 23(f). SERVED ON 07/31/2023. [12765226] [12765226]--[Edited 07/31/2023 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 07/31/2023 03:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
