Esteban Lopez v. Garland
| ADRIAN ESTEBAN LOPEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-855 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 35 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for February 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 10/06/2023 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 34 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for February 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 10/06/2023 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 33 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 31 by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez received. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/26/2023 01:49 PM] |
Filing 32
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 31 by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/21/2023 02:14 PM]
|
| Filing 31 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/21/2023 08:19 AM] |
| Filing 30 DEFECTIVE --- REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [23-855, 23-358]--[Duplicate entry] [Entered: 09/21/2023 08:20 AM] [Edited: 09/21/2023 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 29 CERTIFICATION for Law Student Representation Form filed by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [23-855, 23-358] [Entered: 09/21/2023 08:16 AM] |
| Filing 28 CERTIFICATION for Law Student Representation Form filed by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/21/2023 08:12 AM] |
| Filing 27 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for January 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 26 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 24 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/13/2023 02:59 PM] |
|
Filing 25
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 24 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:45 AM]
|
| Filing 24 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 08/31/2023 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 23 DEFECTIVE --- ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [23-855, 23-358]--[COURT UPDATE: Duplicate entry] [Entered: 08/31/2023 01:26 PM] [Edited: 09/01/2023 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 22 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Sheri Robyn Glaser for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sheri Robyn Glaser for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sheri Robyn Glaser for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [23-855, 23-358] [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of submitted in 23-358 at DE by received. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 07/13/2023 01:51 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. submitted in 23-358 at DE by is filed. Within 7 days of this order, must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 07/07/2023 03:16 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. The motions for summary disposition (Docket Entry No. 14 in No. 23-358 and Docket Entry No. 15 in No. 23-855) are denied because the questions raised by these petitions are sufficient to warrant full briefing. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(a) (standard for summary disposition); see also United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). The motion for appointment of pro bono counsel in petition No. 23-358 (Docket Entry No. 4 in No. 23-358) is denied as moot because counsel has appeared for petitioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis in petition No. 23-855 (Docket Entry No. 3 in No. 23-855) is granted. The motion to consolidate petition Nos. 23-358 and No. 23-855 (Docket Entry No. 17 in No. 23-358 and Docket Entry No. 6 in No. 23-855) is granted. The parties must include both case numbers on all future filings. The Clerk will file the consolidated opening brief submitted at Docket Entry No. 18 in petition No. 23-358. The consolidated opening brief has been filed in petition No. 23-855. The consolidated answering brief is due September 5, 2023. The optional consolidated reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 07/07/2023 02:51 PM]
|
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to Motion for Summary Disposition (DE 15) filed by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [Entered: 07/03/2023 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION for summary disposition filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/29/2023 07:21 PM] |
| Filing 14 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/29/2023 07:20 PM] |
| Filing 13 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Andrew B. Insenga for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/29/2023 03:37 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew B. Insenga for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/29/2023 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 11 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez received. [Entered: 06/15/2023 11:37 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 9 by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/13/2023 09:14 AM]
|
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez.--[COURT UPDATE: removed duplicate PDF of addendum.] [Entered: 06/12/2023 07:19 AM] [Edited: 06/12/2023 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 05/19/2023 08:19 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew B. Insenga for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/08/2023 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to consolidate filed by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [Entered: 05/05/2023 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/9/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 6/30/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/8/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 10/10/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/05/2023 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/5/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-855 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/05/2023 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/05/2023 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/05/2023 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/05/2023 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Esteban Lopez v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ADRIAN ESTEBAN LOPEZ | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Vernon Burch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Sheri Robyn Glaser |
| Represented By: | Mr. Andrew B. Insenga |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
