Lopez v. Garland
| CHRISTIAN LOPEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-870 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Christian Lopez received. [Entered: 10/23/2023 02:49 PM] |
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 12/13/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/02/2023 10:34 AM]
|
| Filing 17 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/02/2023 05:36 AM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Christian Lopez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/14/2023 08:53 AM]
|
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Christian Lopez. (Duplicate submission, correct entry is DE 14) [Entered: 09/12/2023 06:23 AM] [Edited: 09/14/2023 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Christian Lopez.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDFs] [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:57 PM] [Edited: 09/14/2023 08:47 AM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 9/11/2023, Answering Brief Due 11/13/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 07/14/2023 09:26 AM]
|
| Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Christian Lopez. [Entered: 07/14/2023 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 11 OPPOSITION TO SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/29/2023 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Christian Lopez. [Entered: 05/22/2023 11:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 05/22/2023 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Spencer Shucard for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Spencer Shucard for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/08/2023 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 6 Motion to Stay Removal filed at DE 5; Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 7/3/2023. [Entered: 05/08/2023 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/08/2023 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/12/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/11/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 10/10/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/08/2023 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/8/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-870 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/08/2023 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/08/2023 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 5/3/2023. [Entered: 05/08/2023 01:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lopez v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CHRISTIAN LOPEZ | |
| Represented By: | Kyle Edgerton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Spencer Shucard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
