Akahoshi v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
LAURA AKAHOSHI, FORMER CHIEF COMPLIANCE OFFICER |
OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY |
23-938 |
May 17, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 17) to amend the briefing schedule is granted. The record on appeal is due November 8, 2023. The opening brief is due February 6, 2024. The answering brief is due May 6, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 30 days after service of the answering brief. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 18) for leave to file oversized opening, answering, and reply briefs is denied without prejudice to each party filing a separate renewed motion accompanied by the proposed oversized brief. [Entered: 11/03/2023 03:32 PM] |
Filing 21 CERTIFIED LIST OF AGENCY RECORD filed by Respondent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. [Entered: 11/03/2023 04:09 AM] |
Filing 20 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Brian Witthuhn for Petitioner Laura Akahoshi. [Entered: 10/27/2023 09:39 AM] |
Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brian Witthuhn for Petitioner Laura Akahoshi. [Entered: 10/27/2023 09:35 AM] |
Filing 18 MOTION to File Oversized Brief filed by Petitioner Laura Akahoshi. [Entered: 10/10/2023 11:23 AM] |
Filing 17 MOTION to Reset Briefing Schedule filed by Petitioner Laura Akahoshi. [Entered: 10/10/2023 11:05 AM] |
Filing 16 ORDER FILED. Bridget S. BADE, Kenneth K. LEE, Lawrence VANDYKE The motion to dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry No. 11) is denied without prejudice to renewing the arguments in the answering brief. See Natl Indus. v. Republic Natl Life Ins. Co., 677 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1982) (merits panel may consider appellate jurisdiction despite earlier denial of motion to dismiss). The opening brief is due October 31, 2023. The answering brief is due December 1, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/29/2023 02:40 PM] |
Filing 15 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 14) filed by Respondent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. [Entered: 07/14/2023 12:59 PM] |
Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion to Dismiss (DE 11) filed by Petitioner Laura Akahoshi. [Entered: 07/06/2023 06:49 PM] |
Filing 13 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 12) to modify the schedule to respond to the motion to dismiss is granted. Any response is due July 6, 2023. Any reply is due July 14, 2023. [Entered: 07/03/2023 01:03 PM] |
Filing 12 MOTION to reset briefing schedule filed by Respondent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. [Entered: 06/30/2023 06:53 AM] |
Filing 11 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Respondent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. [Entered: 06/22/2023 11:10 AM] |
Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Jason Fernandes for Respondent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. [Entered: 06/20/2023 02:57 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jason Fernandes for Respondent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. [Entered: 06/20/2023 02:19 PM] |
Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent John Paul Foley for Respondent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. [Entered: 06/20/2023 11:50 AM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John Paul Foley for Respondent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. [Entered: 06/20/2023 11:44 AM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Petitioner Laura Akahoshi. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. --[COURT UPDATE: Attached PDF of mediation questionnaire.] [Entered: 05/24/2023 02:01 PM] [Edited: 05/24/2023 03:45 PM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Justin S. Weddle for Petitioner Laura Akahoshi. [Entered: 05/24/2023 01:57 PM] |
Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due 5/24/2023, Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/7/2023, Respondent Answering Brief due 9/5/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 05/17/2023 10:28 AM] |
Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/5/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-938 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/17/2023 10:22 AM] |
Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 4/5/2023. [Entered: 05/17/2023 10:20 AM] [Edited: 05/17/2023 10:23 AM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/17/2023 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.