Ramirez Muniz v. Garland
| SOLEDAD ONEYDA RAMIREZ MUNIZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-965 |
| May 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 15) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 11/22/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/19/2023 03:14 PM]
|
| Filing 15 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/19/2023 06:09 AM] |
| Filing 14 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Soledad Oneyda Ramirez Muniz is filed. Original and 15 copies. [Entered: 08/21/2023 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Soledad Oneyda Ramirez Muniz. [Entered: 08/21/2023 03:28 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 07/14/2023 01:40 PM]
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/14/2023 08:28 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Before: Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 9) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due July 14, 2023. The opening brief is due August 22, 2023. The answering brief is due October 23, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/30/2023 10:51 AM]
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Soledad Oneyda Ramirez Muniz. [Entered: 06/27/2023 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 06/02/2023 07:03 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 05/31/2023 02:20 PM]
|
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Tracie Nicole Jones for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/22/2023 11:13 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tracie Nicole Jones for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/22/2023 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/23/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 7/14/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/22/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 10/23/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/19/2023 01:31 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/19/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-965 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/19/2023 01:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/19/2023 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/19/2023 01:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ramirez Muniz v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SOLEDAD ONEYDA RAMIREZ MUNIZ | |
| Represented By: | Soledad Oneyda Ramirez Muniz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Tracie Nicole Jones |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
