United States of America v. Olivas
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: JOHN JACOB OLIVAS
Case Number: 23-990
Filed: May 23, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Court Reporter Phyllis Prestons motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file the transcript is granted. The transcript is now due December 15, 2023. Due to the length of extension granted, the court is not inclined to grant further motions for an extension of time to file the transcripts. This order waives the mandatory fee reduction. See Report of the Proceedings of the Judicial Conference of the United States, March 1982 at 10. The opening brief is due January 16, 2024. The answering brief is due February 15, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk will serve this order on court reporter Phyllis Preston and court reporter supervisor Alberto Ortiz at the district court. [Entered: 09/25/2023 02:16 PM]
September 7, 2023 Filing 17 MOTION to Extend Time to File Transcript filed by court reporter . [Entered: 09/07/2023 12:56 PM]
July 25, 2023 Filing 16 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Margaret A. Farrand representing Appellant John Jacob Olivas. [Entered: 07/25/2023 03:15 PM]
July 25, 2023 Filing 15 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Alexander Botoman [Entered: 07/25/2023 02:55 PM]
July 25, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Alexander Botoman for Appellant John Jacob Olivas replacing Margaret A. Farrand. [Entered: 07/25/2023 02:27 PM]
June 29, 2023 Filing 13 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Margaret A. Farrand for Appellant John Jacob Olivas. [Entered: 06/29/2023 02:14 PM]
June 29, 2023 Filing 12 CJA Counsel Appointment. [Entered: 06/29/2023 02:12 PM]
June 29, 2023 Filing 11 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Meghan A. Blanco representing Appellant John Jacob Olivas. [Entered: 06/29/2023 10:59 AM]
June 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. Appellants submission of a completed CJA Form 23 (Docket Entry No. 9-2) is treated as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The motion (Docket Entry No. 9-1) to appoint counsel is treated as a motion by retained counsel Meghan A. Blanco to withdraw and to appoint new counsel. So treated, the motion is granted. The Clerk will remove counsel Blanco from the docket. The Clerk will electronically serve this order on the appointing authority for the Central District of California, who will locate appointed counsel. The appointing authority is requested to send notification of the name, address, and telephone number of appointed counsel to the Clerk of this court at counselappointments@ca9.uscourts.gov within 14 days of locating counsel. Appellants new counsel must order the reporters transcript through submission of a CJA Form 24 to the district court by July 31, 2023. The transcript is due August 30, 2023. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due October 10, 2023; the answering brief is due November 9, 2023; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. If appellant seeks transcripts of proceedings requiring special authorization, that authorization should be obtained from the district court. See 6 Guide to Judiciary Policy 550.40. The Clerk will serve this order on former counsel and appellant individually: Reg. No. 76808-112, USP Coleman II, U.S. Penitentiary, P.O. Box 1034, Coleman, FL 33521. [Entered: 06/29/2023 10:57 AM]
June 26, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant John Jacob Olivas. [Entered: 06/27/2023 08:49 AM]
June 26, 2023 Filing 8 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant John Jacob Olivas. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 9.] [Entered: 06/26/2023 10:06 PM] [Edited: 06/27/2023 08:56 AM]
June 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. The filing and docketing fees for this appeal are overdue. Within 28 days after this order, appellant must pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal, and file in this court proof of such payment. Alternatively, appellant may file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which must be accompanied by a current financial affidavit (CJA Form 23). Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. The Clerk will serve a CJA Form 23 on appellant. [Entered: 06/14/2023 04:56 PM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Eli Alcaraz for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 05/23/2023 03:05 PM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eli Alcaraz for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:40 PM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Frances S. Lewis for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 05/23/2023 01:54 PM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Frances S. Lewis for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 05/23/2023 01:39 PM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence imposed: [Life]. Criminal Appeal Transcript Order Due 6/12/2023, Criminal Appeal Transcript Due 7/11/2023, Criminal Appeal Opening Brief Due 8/21/2023, Criminal Appeal Answering Brief Due 9/19/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 05/23/2023 11:32 AM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-990 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/23/2023 11:29 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Olivas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Mr. Eli Alcaraz
Represented By: Mr. Bram M. Alden
Represented By: Frances S. Lewis
Represented By: Mr. Julius J. Nam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: JOHN JACOB OLIVAS
Represented By: Alexander Botoman
Represented By: Margaret A. Farrand
Represented By: Ms. Meghan A. Blanco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?