Scott Clabourne v. David Shinn, et al
| SCOTT DRAKE CLABOURNE |
| DAVID SHINN, Director, of the Arizona Department of Corrections and CHARLES GOLDSMITH, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex |
| 23-99000 |
| March 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed text clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Petitioner-Appellants unopposed motion for extension of time to file opening brief, Dkt. [ # 3 ], is granted. Appellant's opening brief is due July 11, 2023. Appellees' answering brief is due August 10, 2023. Appellants optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12707460] (AF) [Entered: 05/02/2023 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Scott Drake Clabourne Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 07/11/2023. Date of service: 05/02/2023. [12706856] [23-99000] (Gabrielsen, Timothy) [Entered: 05/02/2023 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 2 Added Attorney(s) S. Jonathan Young for party(s) Appellant Scott Drake Clabourne, in case 23-99000. [12674403] (BY) [Entered: 03/15/2023 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Scott Drake Clabourne opening brief due 05/09/2023. Appellees Charles Goldsmith and David Shinn, Director answering brief due 06/08/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12671498] (HH) [Entered: 03/10/2023 11:48 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
