Lopez Rivas, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: FRANCISCO ANTONIO LOPEZ RIVAS, ALESSANDRA ELIZABETH LOPEZ OLANO, ANDREA CELESTE LOPEZ OLANO, JOSUE ISAIAS LOPEZ OLANO and ESMERALDA ALESSANDRA OLANO PORTILLO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-997
Filed: May 23, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Petitioners amended unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 19) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due December 11, 2023. The answering brief is due February 9, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 18) is denied as moot [Entered: 11/07/2023 05:02 PM]
October 25, 2023 Filing 19 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 18) filed by Petitioner Francisco Antonio Lopez Rivas, Petitioner Alessandra Elizabeth Lopez Olano, Petitioner Andrea Celeste Lopez Olano, Petitioner Josue Isaias Lopez Olano, Petitioner Esmeralda Alessandra Olano Portillo. [Entered: 10/25/2023 09:09 PM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 18 MOTION to Extend Time to File Opening Brief filed by Petitioner Francisco Antonio Lopez Rivas, Petitioner Alessandra Elizabeth Lopez Olano, Petitioner Andrea Celeste Lopez Olano, Petitioner Josue Isaias Lopez Olano, Petitioner Esmeralda Alessandra Olano Portillo. [Entered: 10/23/2023 09:19 PM] [Edited: 10/24/2023 07:34 AM]
September 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry Nos. 15, 16) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 27, 2023. The answering brief is due December 26, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/28/2023 10:17 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 16 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 15) filed by Petitioner Francisco Antonio Lopez Rivas, Petitioner Alessandra Elizabeth Lopez Olano, Petitioner Andrea Celeste Lopez Olano, Petitioner Josue Isaias Lopez Olano, Petitioner Esmeralda Alessandra Olano Portillo. [Entered: 09/21/2023 10:25 AM]
September 20, 2023 Filing 15 MOTION to Extend Time to File Opening Brief filed by Petitioner Francisco Antonio Lopez Rivas, Petitioner Alessandra Elizabeth Lopez Olano, Petitioner Andrea Celeste Lopez Olano, Petitioner Josue Isaias Lopez Olano, Petitioner Esmeralda Alessandra Olano Portillo. [Entered: 09/20/2023 04:58 PM] [Edited: 09/21/2023 07:19 AM]
August 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 9/27/2023, Answering Brief Due 11/24/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/17/2023 08:20 AM]
August 16, 2023 Filing 13 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Francisco Antonio Lopez Rivas, Petitioner Alessandra Elizabeth Lopez Olano, Petitioner Andrea Celeste Lopez Olano, Petitioner Josue Isaias Lopez Olano, Petitioner Esmeralda Alessandra Olano Portillo. [Entered: 08/16/2023 07:34 PM]
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 11) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The opening brief is due August 28, 2023. The answering brief is due October 25, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/26/2023 02:58 PM]
June 21, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Francisco Antonio Lopez Rivas, Petitioner Alessandra Elizabeth Lopez Olano, Petitioner Andrea Celeste Lopez Olano, Petitioner Josue Isaias Lopez Olano, Petitioner Esmeralda Alessandra Olano Portillo. [Entered: 06/21/2023 05:42 PM]
June 20, 2023 Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Gervy Jhon Tesoro for Petitioner Alessandra Elizabeth Lopez Olano, Petitioner Andrea Celeste Lopez Olano, Petitioner Esmeralda Alessandra Olano Portillo, Petitioner Francisco Antonio Lopez Rivas, Petitioner Josue Isaias Lopez Olano. [Entered: 06/20/2023 04:14 PM]
June 20, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gervy Jhon Tesoro for Petitioner Alessandra Elizabeth Lopez Olano, Petitioner Andrea Celeste Lopez Olano, Petitioner Esmeralda Alessandra Olano Portillo, Petitioner Francisco Antonio Lopez Rivas, Petitioner Josue Isaias Lopez Olano. [Entered: 06/20/2023 03:47 PM]
June 8, 2023 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 06/08/2023 08:01 AM]
May 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioners must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioners do not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioners. [Entered: 05/31/2023 04:25 PM]
May 25, 2023 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Brandon Thomas Callahan for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/25/2023 07:39 AM]
May 25, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Brandon Thomas Callahan for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/25/2023 07:35 AM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/27/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/28/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 10/25/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:49 PM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/23/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-997 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:45 PM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 5/1/2023. [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:44 PM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:44 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lopez Rivas, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FRANCISCO ANTONIO LOPEZ RIVAS
Represented By: Jose Z. Marin
Represented By: Mr. Gervy Jhon Tesoro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ALESSANDRA ELIZABETH LOPEZ OLANO
Represented By: Jose Z. Marin
Represented By: Mr. Gervy Jhon Tesoro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ANDREA CELESTE LOPEZ OLANO
Represented By: Jose Z. Marin
Represented By: Mr. Gervy Jhon Tesoro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSUE ISAIAS LOPEZ OLANO
Represented By: Jose Z. Marin
Represented By: Mr. Gervy Jhon Tesoro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ESMERALDA ALESSANDRA OLANO PORTILLO
Represented By: Jose Z. Marin
Represented By: Mr. Gervy Jhon Tesoro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Mr. Brandon Thomas Callahan
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?