Arizona Yage Assembly, et al. v. Garland, et al.
Plaintiff: ARIZONA YAGE ASSEMBLY, a California corporation, WINFIELD SCOTT STANLEY, III, NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VISIONARY CHURCHES, a California Corporation and VINE OF LIGHT CHURCH
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and CHRIS MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Case Number: 24-1385
Filed: March 8, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 8, 2024 Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Lisa Newman representing Appellee Alejandro Mayorkas, Appellee Anne Milgram, Appellee Chris Magnus, Appellee Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/08/2024 02:30 PM]
March 8, 2024 Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Sarah Jane Clark [Entered: 03/08/2024 02:29 PM]
March 8, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sarah Jane Clark for Appellee Alejandro Mayorkas, Appellee Anne Milgram, Appellee Chris Magnus, Appellee Merrick B. Garland replacing Lisa Newman. [Entered: 03/08/2024 01:02 PM]
March 8, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/13/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 3/19/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 4/18/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 5/28/2024, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 6/28/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/08/2024 10:08 AM]
March 8, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:20-cv-02373-ROS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-1385 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/08/2024 10:00 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Arizona Yage Assembly, et al. v. Garland, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARIZONA YAGE ASSEMBLY, a California corporation
Represented By: Mr. Charles Carreon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WINFIELD SCOTT STANLEY, III
Represented By: Mr. Charles Carreon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NORTH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF VISIONARY CHURCHES, a California Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VINE OF LIGHT CHURCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Sarah Jane Clark
Represented By: Lisa Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Represented By: Sarah Jane Clark
Represented By: Lisa Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration
Represented By: Sarah Jane Clark
Represented By: Lisa Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRIS MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Represented By: Sarah Jane Clark
Represented By: Lisa Newman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?