Palmer, et al. v. Trevino, et al.
| SUSAN SOTO PALMER, ALBERTO MACIAS, FABIOLA LOPEZ, CATY PADILLA and HELIDORA MORFIN |
| STEVEN HOBBS, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and STATE OF WASHINGTON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington |
| JOSE A. TREVINO, ISMAEL F. CAMPOS and ALEX YBARRA |
| 24-1602 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Assign Case to Prior Panel filed by Appellee Susan Soto Palmer, Appellee Alberto Macias, Appellee Fabiola Lopez, Appellee Caty Padilla, Appellee Helidora Morfin. [Entered: 03/19/2024 09:55 AM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. The court has received appellants emergency motion for a stay pending appeal. Responses to the motion are due by 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time on Wednesday, March 20, 2024. Any reply is due by 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time on Thursday, March 21, 2024. [Entered: 03/19/2024 09:04 AM]
|
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings, Order, or Judgment (DE 6) filed by Appellant Jose A. Trevino, Appellant Ismael F. Campos, Appellant Alex Ybarra. [Entered: 03/18/2024 05:31 PM] |
| Filing 6 EMERGENCY MOTION to Stay Lower Court or Agency Proceedings, Order, or Judgment filed by Appellant Jose A. Trevino, Appellant Ismael F. Campos, Appellant Alex Ybarra. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry 3.] [Entered: 03/18/2024 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Accept Oversized Document Other than a Brief filed by Appellant Jose A. Trevino, Appellant Ismael F. Campos, Appellant Alex Ybarra. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry 3.] [Entered: 03/18/2024 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 Emergency MOTION Circuit Rule 27-3 Certificate filed by Appellant Jose A. Trevino, Appellant Ismael F. Campos, Appellant Alex Ybarra. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry 3.] [Entered: 03/18/2024 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 DEFECTIVE -- MOTION to File Oversized Brief filed by Appellant Jose A. Trevino, Appellant Ismael F. Campos, Appellant Alex Ybarra. [Wrong filing type used, correct entries are DE 4, 5 and 6.] [Entered: 03/18/2024 04:02 PM] [Edited: 03/18/2024 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 3/25/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 3/29/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 4/29/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 6/7/2024, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 7/8/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/18/2024 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:22-cv-05035-RSL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-1602 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/18/2024 12:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
