Shreves v. Godfrey, et al.
| RICHARD E. SHREVES |
| DEMETRIC GODFREY, CRYSTAL THOMPSON, BRIAN GOOTKIN, JIM SALMONSEN, CYNTHIA WOLKEN, JIM ANDERSON, SCOTT MCNEIL, CHRIS LAMB, AMANDA KAMBIC, TERRIE STEFALO, KRISTY COBBAN, SALLE ODEN, GREG BUDD, BRIAN BUCKLER, ANTHONY HOLLAND, JUSTIN POMEROY, ANDREW CORNELIUS, NICHOLAS MOE, DAKOTA REESTED, CARRIE WALSTED, DENNIS JOHNSON and WENDY LARSEN |
| 24-1692 |
| March 21, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. This matter is referred to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of forma pauperis status is appropriate where district court finds the appeal to be frivolous). If the district court elects to revoke in forma pauperis status, the district court is requested to notify this court and the parties of such determination within 21 days of the date of this referral. If the district court does not revoke in forma pauperis status, such status will continue automatically for this appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). This referral shall not affect the briefing schedule previously established by this court. [Entered: 03/22/2024 03:29 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/30/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/21/2024 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 6:23-cv-00035-BMM-KLD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-1692 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/21/2024 12:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
