Prada Garcia, et al. v. Garland
| SANDRO PRADA GARCIA, YESICA ALEJANDRA BARRETO NINO, MARLON ESTEBAN PRADA ACOSTA and DANA SOFIA PRADA BARRETO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-2173 |
| April 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Michele Yvette Frances Sarko. [Entered: 04/09/2024 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michele Yvette Frances Sarko for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/09/2024 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Sandro Prada Garcia, Petitioner Yesica Alejandra Barreto Nino, Petitioner Marlon Esteban Prada Acosta, Petitioner Dana Sofia Prada Barreto. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry 6.] [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 7 Fee Paid by Sandro Prada Garcia, Yesica Alejandra Barreto Nino, Marlon Esteban Prada Acosta, Dana Sofia Prada Barreto. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2605588-ACMS. [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE -- MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Sandro Prada Garcia, Petitioner Yesica Alejandra Barreto Nino, Petitioner Marlon Esteban Prada Acosta, Petitioner Dana Sofia Prada Barreto. REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 8.] [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:14 PM] [Edited: 04/08/2024 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 5/20/2024, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 6/10/2024, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 6/27/2024, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 7/29/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Stay Removal filed by Petitioner Sandro Prada Garcia, Petitioner Yesica Alejandra Barreto Nino, Petitioner Marlon Esteban Prada Acosta, Petitioner Dana Sofia Prada Barreto. REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/8/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-2173 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 3/8/2024. [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Dana Sofia Prada Barreto, Petitioner Marlon Esteban Prada Acosta, Petitioner Sandro Prada Garcia, Petitioner Yesica Alejandra Barreto Nino. [Entered: 04/08/2024 02:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
