McGhee v. State of Arizona, et al.
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MARTIN MCGHEE
Defendant: STATE OF ARIZONA, a sovereign State of the United States of America, RYAN FORSMAN, as an individual and in his official capacity as police officer employed by the City of Flagstaff, DARA RABIN, as a private party state actor, WILLIAM RING, in his official capacity as Coconino County Attorney, AMMON BARKER, in his official capacity as Chief Deputy Coconino County Attorney, COUNTY OF COCONINO, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Case Number: 24-2460
Filed: April 18, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2024 Filing 5 Amended Notice of Appeal Received. [Entered: 04/19/2024 02:40 PM]
April 19, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Joseph McGhee. [Entered: 04/19/2024 12:12 PM]
April 18, 2024 Filing 3 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Alexander Charles Jones representing Appellee State of Arizona.--[COURT CORRECTION: Attorney added to case in error.] [Entered: 04/18/2024 03:42 PM]
April 18, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 5/28/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 6/27/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/18/2024 02:16 PM]
April 18, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cv-08601-SRB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-2460 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/18/2024 02:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: McGhee v. State of Arizona, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MARTIN MCGHEE
Represented By: Joseph Martin McGhee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF ARIZONA, a sovereign State of the United States of America
Represented By: Eric Knobloch
Represented By: Mary Curtin
Represented By: Mr. Alexander Charles Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RYAN FORSMAN, as an individual and in his official capacity as police officer employed by the City of Flagstaff
Represented By: James M. Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DARA RABIN, as a private party state actor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM RING, in his official capacity as Coconino County Attorney
Represented By: James M. Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMMON BARKER, in his official capacity as Chief Deputy Coconino County Attorney
Represented By: James M. Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF COCONINO, a political subdivision of the State of Arizona
Represented By: James M. Jellison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Represented By: Eric Knobloch
Represented By: Mary Curtin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?