Human Rights Defense Center, Inc. v. Uttecht, et al.
HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, INC. |
JEFFERY ALFRED UTTECHT, Superintendent of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center of the Washington Department of Corrections in his individual and official capacities and JOHN D. TURNER, Mailroom Sergeant of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center in his individual and official capacities |
24-2552 |
April 23, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 4/29/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 5/2/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 6/3/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 7/12/2024, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 8/12/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/23/2024 01:13 PM] |
Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 4:21-cv-05047-TOR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-2552 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/23/2024 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Human Rights Defense Center, Inc. v. Uttecht, et al. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENSE CENTER, INC. | |
Represented By: | Katherine Cooper Chamberlain |
Represented By: | Mr. Jesse A. Wing |
Represented By: | Nathaniel Flack |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JEFFERY ALFRED UTTECHT, Superintendent of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center of the Washington Department of Corrections in his individual and official capacities | |
Represented By: | Katherine Faber |
Represented By: | Sarah C. Brisbin, ASATG |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: JOHN D. TURNER, Mailroom Sergeant of Coyote Ridge Corrections Center in his individual and official capacities | |
Represented By: | Katherine Faber |
Represented By: | Sarah C. Brisbin, ASATG |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.