Hernandez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Hernandez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.

Hernandez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.

Plaintiff / Appellee:	FELIX RUBIO HERNANDEZ
Defendant / Appellant:	UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and UR M. JADDOU, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Case Number:	24-269
Filed:	January 17, 2024
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
January 17, 2024	Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/26/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/29/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/29/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/17/2024 01:35 PM]
January 17, 2024	Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-00904-MJP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-269 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/17/2024 01:32 PM]

Date Filed

Document Text

January 17, 2024

Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 1/26/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 2/29/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 3/29/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 01/17/2024 01:35 PM]

January 17, 2024

Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-00904-MJP has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-269 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 01/17/2024 01:32 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hernandez v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: FELIX RUBIO HERNANDEZ
Represented By:	Matt Adams
Represented By:	Glenda M. Aldana Madrid
Represented By:	Ki Hoon Hur
Represented By:	Leila Kang
Represented By:	Aaron Korthuis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Represented By:	Mr. Nickolas Bohl, ASUSAT
Represented By:	Mary Larakers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security
Represented By:	Mr. Nickolas Bohl, ASUSAT
Represented By:	Mary Larakers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: UR M. JADDOU, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By:	Mr. Nickolas Bohl, ASUSAT
Represented By:	Mary Larakers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?