Hidalgo Sanchez, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: YADIRA HIDALGO SANCHEZ and YULISA HIDALGO HIDALGO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 24-3194
Filed: May 20, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2024 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Anthony Nardi [Entered: 05/20/2024 01:41 PM]
May 20, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Nardi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/20/2024 12:40 PM]
May 20, 2024 Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 7/1/2024, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 7/22/2024, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 8/8/2024, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 9/9/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 05/20/2024 10:33 AM]
May 20, 2024 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/17/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-3194 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/20/2024 10:31 AM]
May 17, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/20/2024 10:30 AM]
May 17, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Yadira Hidalgo Sanchez, Petitioner Yulisa Hidalgo Hidalgo. [Entered: 05/20/2024 10:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Hidalgo Sanchez, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: YADIRA HIDALGO SANCHEZ
Represented By: Mr. Richard Bambl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: YULISA HIDALGO HIDALGO
Represented By: Mr. Richard Bambl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Mr. Anthony Nardi
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?