Meldrum v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al.
| DEIRDRE MELDRUM |
| RF SHANGRAW, JR., in his official and individual capacity, SHANGRAW, First Name Unknown, named as Jane Doe Shangraw, CHENG, First Name Unknown, named as Jane Doe Cheng, ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, a public entity, MICHAEL M. CROW, in his official and individual capacity, Rick Shangraw, ROBERT E. PAGE, JR., in his official and individual capacity, AUGUSTINE CHENG, in his official and individual capacity, MARK SEARLE, in his official and individual capacity, SKYSONG INNOVATIONS LLC, BARRY GRAHAM RITCHIE, in his official and individual capacity, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John and Jane Does I-X in their official and individual capacity, SETHURAMAN PANCHANATHAN, in his official and individual capacity, CROW, First Name Unknown, named as Jane Doe Crow, JOSHUA LABAER, is his official and individual capacity, PAGE, First Name Unknown, named as Jane Doe Page, TAMARA DEUSER, in her official and individual capacity, SEARLE, First Name Unknown, named as Jane Doe Searle, RITCHIE, First Name Unknown, named as Jane Doe Ritchie, PANCHANATHAN, First Name Unknown, named as Jane Doe Panchanathan, LABAER, First Name Unknown, named as Jane Doe LaBaer, Mary Shangraw, Elise Switzer and DEUSER, First Name Unknown, named as John Doe Deuser |
| 24-3914 |
| June 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Agreements to dismiss claims without prejudice . . . suggest manipulation of appellate jurisdiction. See Am. States Ins. Co. v. Dastar Corp., 318 F.3d 881, 885-92 (9th Cir. 2003) (noting that a stipulation to dismiss certain claims without prejudice may be manipulative where it permit[s] the re-institution of [those] claims if the district court[] [is] reversed on appeal); see also Dannenberg v. Software Toolworks Inc., 16 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir. 1994) ([L]itigants should not be able to avoid the final judgment rule without fully relinquishing the ability to further litigate unresolved claims.). This court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Within 21 days, appellant must either file a statement explaining why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal. If appellant does not comply with this order, the court will dismiss this appeal. See Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. If appellant files a statement, a response may be filed within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 06/27/2024 03:12 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 7/1/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 7/2/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 8/1/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 09/1/2024, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 10/10/2024. For appeal no. 24-3914, 2:20-cv-02165-GMS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached amended Time Schedule Order] [Entered: 06/26/2024 07:20 AM] [Edited: 06/26/2024 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:20-cv-02165-GMS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-3914 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 06/26/2024 07:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
