Estate of Cindy Lou Hill v. NaphCare, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF CINDY LOU HILL, by and through its personal representative, Joseph A. Grube
Defendant: NAPHCARE, INC., an Alabama corporation and COUNTY OF SPOKANE, a political subdivision of the State of Washington
Case Number: 24-4126
Filed: July 5, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 5, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Erik Heipt for Appellee Estate of Cindy Lou Hill. [Entered: 07/05/2024 04:19 PM]
July 5, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Edwin Budge for Appellee Estate of Cindy Lou Hill. [Entered: 07/05/2024 04:15 PM]
July 5, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 7/10/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 8/14/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 9/13/2024. For appeal no. 24-4126, 2:20-cv-00410-MKD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/05/2024 03:30 PM]
July 5, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:20-cv-00410-MKD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-4126 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/05/2024 03:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Estate of Cindy Lou Hill v. NaphCare, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NAPHCARE, INC., an Alabama corporation
Represented By: Eric B. Wolff
Represented By: Ms. Lauren Pardee Ruben
Represented By: Mr. Michael Robert Huston
Represented By: Mr. David A. Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF SPOKANE, a political subdivision of the State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF CINDY LOU HILL, by and through its personal representative, Joseph A. Grube
Represented By: Mr. Hank Balson
Represented By: Wynne Muscatine Graham
Represented By: Devi Rao
Represented By: Edwin Budge
Represented By: Erik Heipt
Represented By: Mr. Amir Ali
Represented By: Megha Ram
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?