Creech v. United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Boise
| THOMAS EUGENE CREECH |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE |
| IDAHO COMMISSION OF PARDONS AND PAROLE and JAN M BENNETTS, Ada county Prosecuting Attorney, in her official capacity |
| 24-4455 |
| July 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Creech v. United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Boise
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 07/19/2024 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/19/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-4455 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 07/19/2024 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Thomas Eugene Creech. [Entered: 07/19/2024 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Thomas Eugene Creech. [Entered: 07/19/2024 01:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Creech v. United States District Court for the District of Idaho, Boise | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: IDAHO COMMISSION OF PARDONS AND PAROLE | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca Strauss |
| Represented By: | Ms. Mary Karin Magnelli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Real party in interest: JAN M BENNETTS, Ada county Prosecuting Attorney, in her official capacity | |
| Represented By: | Sherry A. Morgan |
| Represented By: | Heather McCarthy |
| Represented By: | Mr. Dayton P. Reed |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: THOMAS EUGENE CREECH | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Christopher Michael Sanchez |
| Represented By: | Jonah Horwitz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
