Herrera, et al. v. City of Palmdale, et al.
| WILLIAM RYAN HERRERA, WILLIAM ROBERT HERRERA, Individually and on behalf of their minor child N. P. H., MONA MOLINA HERRERA, Individually and on behalf of their minor child N. P. H. and PALMDALE LODGING, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company |
| Palmdale Officer BLAKELY, individual and official capacity, JAMES PURTEE, individual and official capacity, NARDY LOPEZ, individual and official capacity, Deputy Sheriff RICHARD LEON, individual and official capacity, BUD DAVIS, individual and official capacity, NOEL JAMES DORAN, individual and official capacity, Deputy Sheriff SCOTT SORROW, individual and official capacity, Deputy Sheriff DESHAUN MILES, individual and official capacity, Palmdale Officer RAPOSAS, individual and official capacity, CITY OF PALMDALE, a municipal corporation, SARA SHREVES, individual and official capacity, Deputy Sheriff CHARLES DANA, individual and official capacity, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, GEORGE SCHNEIDER, individual and official capacity, ANNE AMBROSE, individual and official capacity, MARK DYLER, individual and official capacity, ROB BRUCE, individual and official capacity, Deputy Sheriff GUSTAVO MUNOZ, individual and official capacity, Palmdale Officer ANTHONY BONELLI, individual and official capacity, Deputy Sheriff BRANDON JACOBS, individual and official capacity, Palmdale Officer MARK MILLER, individual and official capacity, Deputy Sheriff STEVE DIAZ, individual and official capacity, Deputy Sheriff FRANK ARCIDIACONO, individual and official capacity, Deputy Sheriff JOHN GALLAGHER, individual and official capacity and Deputy Sheriff WYATT WALDRON, individual and official capacity |
| 24-4489 |
| July 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| HERRERA, ET AL. V. CITY OF PALMDALE, ET AL. |
| HERRERA, ET AL. V. CITY OF PALMDALE, ET AL. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 7/29/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 8/5/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 9/4/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 10/15/2024, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 11/14/2024. For appeal no. 24-4489, 2:16-cv-09453-MWF-MAR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/22/2024 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:16-cv-09453-MWF-MAR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-4489 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/22/2024 12:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.