Benson v. O'Malley
| JUDY BENSON |
| MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| 24-4647 |
| July 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ADDED Social Security Access [Entered: 07/30/2024 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Judy Benson. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 07/30/2024 05:24 AM] |
| Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Rory Linerud representing Appellant Judy Benson. [Entered: 07/29/2024 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Christopher Dellert [Entered: 07/29/2024 04:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Dellert for Appellant Judy Benson replacing Rory Linerud. [Entered: 07/29/2024 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 8/5/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/9/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 10/7/2024. For appeal no. 24-4647, 2:23-cv-01371-MTL. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/29/2024 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-01371-MTL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-4647 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/29/2024 03:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Benson v. O'Malley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JUDY BENSON | |
| Represented By: | Rory Linerud |
| Represented By: | Christopher Dellert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY | |
| Represented By: | Gabriel Bono |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
