Harris v. Adams, et al.
Plaintiff: AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant: CAROL GARDNER and RICHARD CODY ADAMS
Case Number: 24-5036
Filed: August 16, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2024 Filing 9 Received PLRA Authorization filed by Appellant Ammar Harris. [Entered: 09/27/2024 02:46 PM]
September 27, 2024 Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Ammar Harris. [Entered: 09/27/2024 01:19 PM]
September 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. On August 20, 2024, this court ordered appellant to complete and file with this court a prisoner authorization form. The order warned appellant that failure to comply would result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk of the Court. To date, appellant has not complied with the courts order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order served on the district court will, 21 days after the date of the order, act as and for the mandate of this court. [Entered: 09/26/2024 11:09 AM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 6 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Samuel Pezone representing Appellee Carol Gardner, Appellee Richard Cody Adams. [Entered: 09/05/2024 08:50 AM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Chris Davis [Entered: 09/05/2024 08:48 AM]
September 5, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Chris Davis for Appellee Carol Gardner, Appellee Richard Cody Adams replacing Samuel Pezone. [Entered: 09/05/2024 08:07 AM]
August 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. A review of the district court docket reflects that appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court, and that such permission has not been revoked to date. Consequently, appellants forma pauperis status continues in this court. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal when funds are available in appellants account. Consequently, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant must complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $605.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10.00, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will send a prisoner authorization form to appellant. [Entered: 08/20/2024 11:49 AM]
August 16, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/26/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 10/28/2024. For appeal no. 24-5036, 2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/16/2024 02:02 PM]
August 16, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-01231-JAD-EJY has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-5036 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/16/2024 02:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Harris v. Adams, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAROL GARDNER
Represented By: Mr. Samuel Pezone
Represented By: Mr. Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD CODY ADAMS
Represented By: Mr. Samuel Pezone
Represented By: Mr. Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMMAR HARRIS
Represented By: Ammar Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?