Vicente Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: KENEDE ISMAR ELIAS VICENTE, MAYLI ELIAS VICENTE and ODILIA VICENTE VASQUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 24-5050
Filed: August 19, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 9, 2026 VICENTE VASQUEZ, ET AL. V. BLANCHE

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Petitioner) 12/9/2024, Answering Brief Due (Respondent) 1/8/2025. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/01/2024 02:53 PM]
October 1, 2024 Filing 11 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Petitioner Odilia Vicente Vasquez, Petitioner Kenede Ismar Elias Vicente, Petitioner Mayli Elias Vicente. [Entered: 10/01/2024 01:33 PM]
August 28, 2024 Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 08/28/2024 08:37 AM]
August 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 4) is granted. The certified administrative record remains due September 30, 2024. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due October 21, 2024. The opening brief is due November 7, 2024. The answering brief is due December 9, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/22/2024 10:46 AM]
August 19, 2024 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Kristin Moresi [Entered: 08/19/2024 01:00 PM]
August 19, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kristin Moresi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/19/2024 12:57 PM]
August 19, 2024 Filing 6 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 9/30/2024, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 10/21/2024, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 11/7/2024, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 12/9/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 08/19/2024 06:53 AM]
August 19, 2024 Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/16/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-5050 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/19/2024 06:50 AM]
August 16, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Kenede Ismar Elias Vicente, Petitioner Mayli Elias Vicente, Petitioner Odilia Vicente Vasquez. [Entered: 08/19/2024 06:49 AM]
August 16, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/19/2024 06:49 AM]
August 16, 2024 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 7/17/2024. [Entered: 08/19/2024 06:49 AM]
August 16, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Kenede Ismar Elias Vicente, Petitioner Mayli Elias Vicente, Petitioner Odilia Vicente Vasquez. [Entered: 08/19/2024 06:49 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vicente Vasquez, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KENEDE ISMAR ELIAS VICENTE
Represented By: Sandy Restrepo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MAYLI ELIAS VICENTE
Represented By: Sandy Restrepo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ODILIA VICENTE VASQUEZ
Represented By: Sandy Restrepo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Ms. Kristin Moresi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?