Stadium Capital LLC, et al. v. View, Inc., et al.
| VIDUL PRAKASH, RAO MULPURI, HOWARD W. LUTNICK, VIEW, INC., f/k/a CF Finance Acquisition Corp. II, ALICE CHAN, CHARLOTTE S. BLECHMAN, PAUL PION, ANSHU JAIN and ROBERT J. HOCHBERG |
| STADIUM CAPITAL LLC and DAVID SHERMAN |
| 24-5051 |
| August 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Peter K. Stris, Counsel for Respondent Douglas D. Geyser. [Entered: 10/02/2024 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Douglas D. Geyser for Respondent David Sherman, Respondent Stadium Capital LLC. [Entered: 10/02/2024 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Peter K. Stris for Respondent David Sherman, Respondent Stadium Capital LLC. [Entered: 10/02/2024 10:17 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. Morgan B. CHRISTEN, Daniel A. BRESS The motions for leave to file a reply (Docket Entry No. 5) and a sur-reply (Docket Entry No. 6) are granted. The petition for permission to appeal is granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1292(b). Within 14 days, petitioners must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d)(1). The conditional cross-petition is granted. To the extent that respondents seek to challenge any district court ruling outside of the certified order, however, this court may lack jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1292(b); Couch v. Telescope Inc., 611 F.3d 629, 632-35 (9th Cir. 2010) (proper district court certification is a jurisdictional prerequisite to exercising jurisdiction over an appeal under 1292(b)). Within 14 days, respondents must also comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d)(1) [Entered: 09/19/2024 04:02 PM]
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to File Reply filed by Respondent Stadium Capital LLC, Respondent David Sherman. [Entered: 09/12/2024 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Reply filed by Petitioner View, Inc., Petitioner Rao Mulpuri. [Entered: 09/05/2024 07:55 PM] |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Petition for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) (DE 1) filed by Respondent Stadium Capital LLC, Respondent David Sherman. [Entered: 08/26/2024 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for Permission to Appeal. [Entered: 08/19/2024 07:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/16/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-5051 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 08/19/2024 07:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b) filed by Petitioner Alice Chan, Petitioner Anshu Jain, Petitioner Charlotte S. Blechman, Petitioner Howard W. Lutnick, Petitioner Paul Pion, Petitioner Rao Mulpuri, Petitioner Robert J. Hochberg, Petitioner Vidul Prakash, Petitioner View, Inc.. [Entered: 08/19/2024 07:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
