Doe LS 340, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
| B. R., A. M., KATHERINE HYLIN, JANE DOE LS 340, H. B., R. M., TAYLOR GAVIN, V.R., JANE DOE LS 63, JANE DOE LS 155, AUNDREYA ROLLO, A. H. M., CYNTHIA CRAWFORD, A. G., C. S., KELLY COWSERT, M. H., JESSICA FRESHWATER, BECK GLASER, E. R., D. P., ELUNDA MURPHY, WILLIAM ADORNO, JANE DOE LS 218, S.W., E. E., R. T., N. F., E. D., JANE DOE LS 57, JANE DOE LS 264, JANE DOE LS 365, JANE DOE LS 259, JANE DOE LS 348, JANE DOE LS 158, JANE DOE LS 388, JANE DOE LS 13, JANE DOE LS 37, JANE DOE LS 144, JANE DOE LS 154, JANE DOE LS 257, JANE DOE LS 237, JANE DOE LS 164, JANE DOE LS 249, JANE DOE LS 159, JANE DOE LS 67, JANE DOE LS 134, JANE DOE LS 320, JANE DOE LS 260, JANE DOE LS 149, JANE DOE LS 203, JANE DOE LS 354, ARIANE CUNNINGHAM, JANE DOE LS 74, JANE DOE LS 244, JANE DOE LS 174, JANE DOE LS 168, JANE DOE LS 353, JANE DOE LS 97, JANE DOE LS 284, JANE DOE LS 311, JANE DOE LS 266, JANE DOE LS 390, JILLIAN SULLIVAN, KATIE ESPINOSA, K. O., E. C., J. B., H. D., TRAVON BROWN, JANE DOE LS 98, JANE DOE LS 241, JANE DOE LS 66, JANE DOE LS 126, JANE DOE LS 317, JANE DOE LS 234, JANE DOE F-1, MELANIE HALSTENBERG, A. P., JANE ROE CL 1, JANE ROE CL 2, JANE ROE CL 3, C. T., M. R., S. D., C. L., AUDRIAUNA FITTRO, JANE DOE LS 256, JANE DOE LS 326, JANE DOE LS 200, N. M., JANE DOE F-3, J. C., HEATHER WORZALLA, JANE DOE LS 25, JANE DOE LS 103, JANE DOE LS 33, MARKTEZ GOVAN, M. F. A., R. H., MARQUITA HARRIS, A. K., JANE DOE LS 377, JANE DOE LS 191, JANE DOE LS 302, JOHN DOE LS 59, JANE DOE LS 322, M. C. H., JANE DOE LS 16, JANE DOE LS 75, ASHLEY JONES, JANE DOE LS 250, A.I., MILDRED HUNTER, T. V., S. A., M.H., W., E. M., L. E., T. R., MARCY GERAGHTY, C.W., L. M., JANE DOE, N. R., JANE DOE LS 35, JANE DOE LS 90, JANE DOE LS 293, JANE DOE LS 231, JANE DOE F-2, JOSHUA CORMIER, JANE DOE LS 238 and JANE DOE LS 91 |
| UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., RASIER, LLC and RASIER-CA, LLC |
| 24-5063 |
| August 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| DOE LS 340, ET AL. V. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 Paper copies (6) of Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 20 by Petitioners received. (sent to panel) [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/26/2024 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 25 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Real Party in Interest Ariane Cunningham. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/25/2024 09:53 AM] |
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 20 by Petitioners is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with tan front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/25/2024 08:18 AM]
|
| Filing 23 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Kannon K. Shanmugam for Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 10/8/2024 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/24/2024 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 22 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Samuel Issacharoff for Real Party in Interest Ariane Cunningham. Hearing in San Francisco - Courtroom 1 in San Francisco, on 10/8/2024 9:00:00 AM. Filer argument time: By myself. (Argument minutes: [-]). Special accommodations: No. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/24/2024 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 21 CITATION of Supplemental Authorities (28j Letter) filed by Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/23/2024 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 20 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC. [23-3445, 24-5063]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief] [Entered: 09/20/2024 04:12 PM] [Edited: 09/25/2024 08:11 AM] |
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Plaintiffs argue for the first time in their supplemental brief filed on September 3, 2024, that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b). See Pls. Supp. Br. [DE 36] at 4-5. The Court would find it helpful to have petitioner-appellant Uber Technologies, Inc.s (Uber) views on this question. Accordingly, by no later than Friday, September 20, 2024, Uber may file an answering brief, not to exceed 1,000 words, strictly limited to the issue of whether the Court has jurisdiction to entertain its interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b). [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/16/2024 11:44 AM]
|
| Filing 18 STATUS REPORT filed by Appellant Uber Technologies, Inc., Appellant Rasier, LLC, Appellant Rasier-CA, LLC. [24-5063, 23-3445] [Entered: 09/12/2024 05:43 PM] |
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. The fees for appeal No. 24-5063 remain due. Within 14 days, appellants must pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/12/2024 10:36 AM]
|
| Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 6 by Katherine Hylin received. (sent to panel) [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/06/2024 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 15 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume submitted at DE 7 by Katherine Hylin received. (sent to panel) [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/06/2024 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 14 Paper copies (6) of Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 8 by Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC received. (Sent to panel). [24-5063, 23-3445] [Entered: 09/05/2024 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 13 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 1 Volume(s) submitted at DE 9 by received. (Sent to panel). [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/05/2024 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 12 Paper copies (6) of Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 8 by received. (Sent to panel). [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/05/2024 12:11 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 36 by Appellee Katherine Hylin is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee Katherine Hylin must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with tan front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 37 by Appellee Katherine Hylin are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee Katherine Hylin must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/04/2024 03:10 PM]
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Supplemental Brief submitted at DE 38 by Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with tan front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 39 by Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/04/2024 11:05 AM]
|
| Filing 9 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/03/2024 08:44 PM] |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Uber Technologies, Inc., Petitioner Rasier, LLC, Petitioner Rasier-CA, LLC. [23-3445, 24-5063] [Entered: 09/03/2024 08:38 PM] |
| Filing 7 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee Katherine Hylin. [24-5063, 23-3445]--[COURT UPDATE: attached corrected PDF of excerpts] [Entered: 09/03/2024 06:47 PM] [Edited: 09/04/2024 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee Katherine Hylin. [24-5063, 23-3445]--[COURT UPDATE: attached corrected PDF of brief.] [Entered: 09/03/2024 06:44 PM] [Edited: 09/04/2024 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 8, 2024 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available #here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [24-5063] [Entered: 08/19/2024 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Tuesday, October 8, 2024 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available #here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [24-5063] [Entered: 08/19/2024 04:16 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. The petition for permission to appeal [DE 1] is GRANTED and petitioners request for a stay pending appeal is DENIED. This appeal is hereby consolidated with the appeal in Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (No. 23-3445). Oral argument will be heard in both appeals on October 8, 2024 at 9:00 AM Courtroom 1, San Francisco. No later than 14 days from the date of this order, the parties may file supplemental briefs, not to exceed 5000 words in length, addressing any additional issues raised by this consolidated case. Petitioners motion for leave to file a reply brief in support of its petition [DE 14] is DENIED as moot. [24-5063, 23-3445] [Entered: 08/19/2024 02:28 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Schedule to be set by further court order. For appeal no. 24-5063, 3:23-md-03084-CRB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/19/2024 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-md-03084-CRB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-5063 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/19/2024 02:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.