Parham v. Robles, et al.
| RONNIE PARHAM |
| CITY OF WEST COVINA, N. ROBLES, Officer; No. 451, DOES, 1 through 10 inclusive, CARLOS GONZALEZ, Officer; No. 444, MATTHEW MUNOZ, Officer; No. 445 and A. HERNANDEZ, Officer; No. 395 |
| 24-5205 |
| August 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call, 10/7/2024, 10:00 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in information. Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 11/7/2024, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/9/2024. [Entered: 09/16/2024 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 9/16/2024, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 09/06/2024 10:20 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Ballou v. McElvain, 29 F.4th 413, 421 (9th Cir. 2022) (explaining that this courts jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment is limited to the question of whether the defendant would be entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, assuming all factual disputes are resolved, and all reasonable inferences are drawn, in plaintiffs favor (citation and internal marks omitted)). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 08/29/2024 04:03 PM]
|
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant N. Robles, Appellant Carlos Gonzalez, Appellant A. Hernandez, Appellant Matthew Munoz. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 08/26/2024 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 8/28/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/7/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 11/7/2024. For appeal no. 24-5205, 2:21-cv-09114-FLA-GJS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/23/2024 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:21-cv-09114-FLA-GJS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-5205 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/23/2024 03:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
