Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians v. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe, et al.
| STILLAGUAMISH TRIBE OF INDIANS |
| UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE, SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL COMMUNITY and TULALIP TRIBES OF WASHINGTON |
| SUQUAMISH TRIBE, SQUAXIN ISLAND TRIBE, NISQUALLY INDIAN TRIBE, QUINAULT INDIAN NATION, SAUK-SUIATTLE INDIAN TRIBE, HOH INDIAN TRIBE, SKOKOMISH INDIAN TRIBE, LUMMI INDIAN NATION, PORT GAMBLE S'KLALLAM TRIBE, MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS, QUILEUTE INDIAN TRIBE and JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE |
| SAUK-SUIATTLE INDIAN TRIBE |
| 24-5511 |
| September 10, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ADDED Amicus Curiae - Pending Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe, with Counsel Jack Warren Fiander. [Entered: 11/07/2024 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 15 AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe. [Entered: 11/07/2024 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 14 AMICUS BRIEF and MOTION for leave to file amicus brief filed by Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe. [Entered: 11/07/2024 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE --- NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jack Warren Fiander for Not Applicable Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe. [Correct entry is DE 14.] [Entered: 11/04/2024 03:47 PM] [Edited: 11/07/2024 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 12 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians received. [Entered: 10/28/2024 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 11 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 8 Volumes and Index Volume submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians received. [Entered: 10/28/2024 11:32 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 5 by Appellant Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 6 by Appellant Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/22/2024 04:41 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 8) granted. Amended briefing schedule FOR ALL APPELLEES: Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/20/2024. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/22/2024 12:14 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellee Swinomish Indian Tribal Community. [Entered: 10/22/2024 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Transmit Physical Exhibit filed by Appellant Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians. [Entered: 10/21/2024 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 6 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians. [Entered: 10/21/2024 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians. [Entered: 10/21/2024 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 09/16/2024 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 09/13/2024 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/16/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/21/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 11/20/2024. For appeal no. 24-5511, 2:17-sp-00003-RSM. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/10/2024 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:17-sp-00003-RSM has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-5511 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/10/2024 03:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
