Bassford v. Newby, et al.
| GABRIEL BASSFORD |
| CITY OF MESA, JOSEPH ADAMS, individual and official capacity, LAUREN RAMIREZ, Prosecutor, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as: John Doe - in his individual and official capacity, MONIQUE BACA, Manager, Circle K, CIRCLE K STORES INC., JOSEPH RANGEL, Police Officer, KEITH RUSSEL, Owner, Circle K, PHILLIP CLARK, Police Officer, PAUL HAWKINS, Prosecutor, SHEPHERD SECURITY INCORPORATED, JOHN DRESCHLER, Security, DAVE SLACKS, Loss Prevention, KYLER NEWBY, MESA POLICE DEPARTMENT, a municipal corporation and MICHAEL DESTEFINO, Police Officer |
| 24-5525 |
| September 11, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Devi Rao [Entered: 10/01/2024 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Devi Rao for Appellee Gabriel Bassford. [Entered: 10/01/2024 08:23 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER FILED. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Ballou v. McElvain, 29 F.4th 413, 421 (9th Cir. 2022) (explaining that this courts jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment is limited to the question of whether the defendant would be entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, assuming all factual disputes are resolved, and all reasonable inferences are drawn, in plaintiffs favor (citation and internal marks omitted)). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 09/24/2024 09:49 AM]
|
| Filing 6 District Court Order/Notice Received. [Motion to dismiss the appeal is denied in this court.] [Entered: 09/20/2024 01:33 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 4) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 11/20/2024, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/20/2024. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/18/2024 11:53 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Kyler Newby. [Entered: 09/18/2024 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 3 District Court Order/Notice Received. [Filing fee of $605.00 received.] [Entered: 09/17/2024 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 10/21/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 11/20/2024. For appeal no. 24-5525, 2:22-cv-00572-JAT. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/11/2024 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:22-cv-00572-JAT has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-5525 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/11/2024 10:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.