Stadium Capital LLC, et al. v. View, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: DAVID SHERMAN and STADIUM CAPITAL LLC
Defendant: VIDUL PRAKASH, CHARLOTTE S. BLECHMAN, PAUL PION, ANSHU JAIN, HOWARD W. LUTNICK, VIEW, INC., ROBERT J. HOCHBERG, ALICE CHAN and RAO MULPURI
Case Number: 24-5743
Filed: September 20, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2024 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Peter K. Stris, Counsel for Appellee Douglas D. Geyser. [Entered: 10/03/2024 01:54 PM]
October 3, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Douglas D. Geyser for Appellee David Sherman, Appellee Stadium Capital LLC. [Entered: 10/03/2024 01:49 PM]
October 3, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Peter K. Stris for Appellee David Sherman, Appellee Stadium Capital LLC. [Entered: 10/03/2024 01:48 PM]
October 2, 2024 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER: By 10/9/2024, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 10/02/2024 03:45 PM]
September 30, 2024 Filing 4 Originating Court Notice of Fee Received. [Entered: 09/30/2024 02:29 PM]
September 25, 2024 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant View, Inc.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 09/25/2024 03:55 PM]
September 20, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 9/25/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 10/10/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 11/8/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 12/12/2024, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 1/13/2025. For appeal no. 24-5743, 5:21-cv-06374-BLF. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 09/20/2024 03:00 PM]
September 20, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:21-cv-06374-BLF has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-5743 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 09/20/2024 02:52 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stadium Capital LLC, et al. v. View, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID SHERMAN
Represented By: Douglas D. Geyser
Represented By: Peter K. Stris
Represented By: Jason Uris
Represented By: Donald R. Hall
Represented By: Frederic S. Fox
Represented By: Mr. Laurence David King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STADIUM CAPITAL LLC
Represented By: Douglas D. Geyser
Represented By: Peter K. Stris
Represented By: Jason Uris
Represented By: Donald R. Hall
Represented By: Frederic S. Fox
Represented By: Mr. Laurence David King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIDUL PRAKASH
Represented By: Ryan Keats
Represented By: Ms. Anna Erickson White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLOTTE S. BLECHMAN
Represented By: James P. Smith, III
Represented By: Mr. Jeffrey Steinfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PAUL PION
Represented By: Mr. Jeffrey Steinfeld
Represented By: James P. Smith, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANSHU JAIN
Represented By: James P. Smith, III
Represented By: Mr. Jeffrey Steinfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HOWARD W. LUTNICK
Represented By: James P. Smith, III
Represented By: Mr. Jeffrey Steinfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VIEW, INC.
Represented By: Mr. John Willis Berry
Represented By: Mr. John M. Gildersleeve
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ROBERT J. HOCHBERG
Represented By: James P. Smith, III
Represented By: Mr. Jeffrey Steinfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALICE CHAN
Represented By: James P. Smith, III
Represented By: Mr. Jeffrey Steinfeld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAO MULPURI
Represented By: Mr. John Willis Berry
Represented By: Mr. John M. Gildersleeve
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?