Swartz v. Dave's Killer Bread, Inc., et al.
Petitioner: DAVE'S KILLER BREAD, INC. and FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
Respondent: DAVID SWARTZ
Case Number: 24-6074
Filed: October 4, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2024 Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for Permission to Appeal. [Entered: 10/04/2024 04:07 PM]
October 4, 2024 Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/4/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6074 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 10/04/2024 04:05 PM]
October 4, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Permission to Appeal Pursuant to FRCP 23(f) filed by Petitioner Dave's Killer Bread, Inc., Petitioner Flowers Foods, Inc.. [Entered: 10/04/2024 04:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Swartz v. Dave's Killer Bread, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DAVE'S KILLER BREAD, INC.
Represented By: Samuel Diamant
Represented By: Mr. Michael L. Resch
Represented By: Ms. Kelly L. Perigoe
Represented By: Quyen L. Ta, AT
Represented By: Amy R. Upshaw
Represented By: Livia M. Kiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: FLOWERS FOODS, INC.
Represented By: Samuel Diamant
Represented By: Mr. Michael L. Resch
Represented By: Ms. Kelly L. Perigoe
Represented By: Quyen L. Ta, AT
Represented By: Amy R. Upshaw
Represented By: Livia M. Kiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DAVID SWARTZ
Represented By: Seth Adam Safier
Represented By: Matthew Thomas McCrary
Represented By: Mr. Anthony J. Patek
Represented By: Hayley Reynolds
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?