United States of America v. Castle
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES CHRISTOPHER CASTLE
Case Number: 24-6515
Filed: October 24, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2024 Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion to Dismiss (DE 12) filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 12/09/2024 10:56 AM]
December 2, 2024 Filing 12 RESPONSE to motion to dismiss (DE 10) filed by Appellant James Christopher Castle. [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:25 AM]
November 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Appellant is not required to pay fees for this appeal because the district court found appellant to be indigent. The motion at Docket Entry No. 8 is therefore unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). The government has moved to dismiss this appeal as untimely. Appellant may respond pro se to this motion by December 2, 2024. The governments optional reply is due by December 9, 2024. Briefing is suspended pending resolution of the governments motion to dismiss. Appellants motion for appointment of counsel will be addressed after the motion to dismiss is decided. [Entered: 11/18/2024 10:27 AM]
November 14, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 11/14/2024 03:34 PM]
November 12, 2024 Filing 9 Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed [Entered: 11/12/2024 03:52 PM]
November 5, 2024 Filing 5 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 4 by Appellant James Christopher Castle is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 11/05/2024 09:00 AM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant James Christopher Castle. [Entered: 11/06/2024 10:56 AM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 7 CORRESPONDENCE filed by Appellant James Christopher Castle. [Entered: 11/06/2024 10:54 AM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant James Christopher Castle. [Entered: 11/06/2024 10:53 AM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 4 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant James Christopher Castle. [Entered: 11/05/2024 08:57 AM]
October 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. This courts docket reflects that appellant is proceeding without counsel. Accordingly, appellant is responsible for preparing a pro se brief stating, in his own words, why he believes the district courts decision was incorrect. The briefing schedule is reset as follows: Appellants pro se opening brief is due on December 9, 2024. Appellant is not required to submit excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. Appellees answering brief and supplemental excerpts of record are due January 8, 2025. The supplemental excerpts of record must contain all of the documents that are cited in appellants pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in appellees brief. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. Appellants optional pro se reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. If appellant does not file a timely pro se opening brief, the appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/29/2024 01:39 PM]
October 24, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: N/A. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 11/4/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/4/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 1/13/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/12/2025. For appeal no. 24-6515, 2:15-cr-00190-KJM-2. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 10/24/2024 11:08 AM]
October 24, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:15-cr-00190-KJM-2 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6515 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/24/2024 10:41 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Castle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES CHRISTOPHER CASTLE
Represented By: James Christopher Castle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Shelley D. Weger
Represented By: Mrs. Audrey Benison Hemesath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?