Lawson v. University of Hawaii, et al.
| KENNETH LAWSON |
| DAVID LASSNER, UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, CAMILLE NELSON, NICHOLAS A. MIRKAY and MICHAEL BRUNO |
| 24-6626 |
| October 30, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| LAWSON V. UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, ET AL. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee University of Hawaii, Appellee David Lassner, Appellee Michael Bruno, Appellee Camille Nelson, Appellee Nicholas A. Mirkay. [Entered: 12/26/2024 10:15 PM] |
| Filing 11 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee University of Hawaii, Appellee David Lassner, Appellee Michael Bruno, Appellee Camille Nelson, Appellee Nicholas A. Mirkay. [Entered: 12/26/2024 09:50 PM] |
| Filing 10 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellee University of Hawaii, Appellee David Lassner, Appellee Michael Bruno, Appellee Camille Nelson, Appellee Nicholas A. Mirkay. [Entered: 12/26/2024 09:18 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Derek T. Mayeshiro for Appellee Camille Nelson, Appellee David Lassner, Appellee Michael Bruno, Appellee Nicholas A. Mirkay, Appellee University of Hawaii. [Entered: 12/26/2024 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 8 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Kenneth Lawson is filed. No paper copies are required at this time. [Entered: 11/29/2024 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Derek T. Mayeshiro [Entered: 11/27/2024 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Justin M. Luney [Entered: 11/27/2024 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Derek T. Mayeshiro for Appellee Camille Nelson, Appellee David Lassner, Appellee Michael Bruno, Appellee Nicholas A. Mirkay, Appellee University of Hawaii. [Entered: 11/27/2024 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Justin M. Luney for Appellee Camille Nelson, Appellee David Lassner, Appellee Michael Bruno, Appellee Nicholas A. Mirkay, Appellee University of Hawaii. [Entered: 11/27/2024 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Kenneth Lawson. [Entered: 11/27/2024 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 11/27/2024, Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/26/2024. For appeal no. 24-6626, 1:24-cv-00172-LEK-RT.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/30/2024 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:24-cv-00172-LEK-RT has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6626 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/30/2024 11:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
