United States of America v. Jackson
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BOBBY JOE JACKSON
Case Number: 24-6693
Filed: November 4, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 31, 2024 Filing 7 MAIL RETURNED. DE 5 addressed to Appellant Bobby Joe Jackson. Action taken: resending to FCI Victorville Medium II, P.O. Box 3850, Adelanto, CA 92301. [Entered: 12/31/2024 02:38 PM]
December 12, 2024 Filing 6 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Tarek Shawky representing Appellant Bobby Joe Jackson. [Entered: 12/12/2024 04:00 PM]
December 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. Retained counsel Tarek Shawky has not responded to this courts November 4, 2024, order. The court relieves counsel Shawky. Within 28 days, appellant must either: (1) retain new counsel to enter an appearance and pay $605 to the district court and file proof of payment in this court, or (2) file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel by submitting a completed Form 23. If appellant does not timely respond to this order, the court will conditionally appoint counsel. The clerk will serve this order on former counsel and will serve this order along with a Form 23 on appellant individually. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 12/12/2024 03:59 PM]
November 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. Court records show that counsel Tarek Shawky was retained to represent appellant before the district court and has not been granted leave to withdraw. Counsel has a duty to continue to represent appellant on appeal until counsel is relieved by this court. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(a). Therefore, although appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal, counsel Shawky remains responsible for prosecuting this appeal and has been entered on the docket as counsel of record. If counsel wishes to withdraw, within 28 days of this order, counsel must file in this court: (1) a substitution of counsel showing that new counsel has been retained, has filed a notice of appearance, and has paid to the district court the $605.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal, or (2) a motion to withdraw and to appoint counsel, accompanied by a completed financial affidavit (CJA Form 23). See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). Alternatively, counsel may move to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, accompanied by an affidavit or signed statement from appellant showing that appellant has been advised of his rights with regard to the appeal and expressly stating that appellant wishes to dismiss the appeal voluntarily. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b); 9th Cir. R. 27-9.1. If counsel does not move to withdraw, within 28 days, the docketing and filing fees in the amount of $605.00 must be paid to the district court and proof of payment must be filed with this court. Further, the existing briefing schedule will remain in effect. The clerk will serve this order and a CJA Form 23 on counsel Shawky and on appellant individually. [Entered: 11/04/2024 02:06 PM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: 105 MONTHS. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 11/15/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/16/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 1/24/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/24/2025. For appeal no. 24-6693, 2:23-cr-00210-DSF-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 11/04/2024 09:30 AM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 2 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Tarek Shawky Court Update: added counsel for appellant [Entered: 11/04/2024 09:28 AM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cr-00210-DSF-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6693 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2024 09:21 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States of America v. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BOBBY JOE JACKSON
Represented By: Mr. Tarek Shawky
Represented By: Bobby Joe Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: David Ransom Friedman
Represented By: Andrew Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?