Rogers v. Taylor, et al.
| RAY CLARENCE ROGERS |
| SHERGILL, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, EDWARD NORMAN, Food Services Supervisor for King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, S. CHARLESTON, Corrections Program Specialist, L. REICHARD, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, J. TURNER, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, KEITH SKINNER, Supervisor, King County Maintenance Division, PEREZ, Sergeant, King County Jail, J. JELLEN, Captain, King County Jail, E. AUDUSEI, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, OFAR, King County Corrections Facility Classification Staff, NANCY, Mental Health Specialist, Seattle King County Public Health Department, A. ASHWATHI, Sergeant / Supervisor, King County Jail, WAGAS, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, T. CRAW, Captain, King County Jail, RUBIO, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, MUTUNGI, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, M. DRAKE, Sergeant, King County Jail, ORTIZ, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, SANTOS, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, JOHN DOE(S), Maintenance Engineer for King County; Corrections Officer, King County Jail, JANE DOE(S), Corrections Officer, King County Jail; Classification Staff at King County Correctional Facility, TAYLOR, Sergeant, King County Jail, CHU, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, LORAYNE VERHELST, Sergeant / Supervisor, King County Jail, MICHAEL TAYLOR, Major, King County Jail, TROY BACON, Commander, King County Jail, BURKE, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, COLE, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, CORDORIA, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, GREGG CURTIS, Corrections Program Administrator, King County Jail, JOY, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, KING COUNTY - STATE OF WASHINGTON, Owner of King County Jail, LUCY, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, B. MEDINA, Property Room Staff, King County Jail, K. MILLER, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, MOEN, Corrections Officer, King County Jail, ALLEN NANCE, Director, King County Jail, K. WILLIAMS, Sergeant, King County Jail, EDMONDS, Corrections Officer, King County Jail and SEATTLE AND KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH |
| 24-6695 |
| November 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of change of address filed by Appellant Ray Clarence Rogers. [Entered: 12/19/2024 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Appellant Ray Clarence Rogers. [Entered: 12/19/2024 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Ray Clarence Rogers. [Request for transcripts.] [Entered: 12/19/2024 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to court order (DE 4) filed by Appellant Ray Clarence Rogers. [Entered: 12/19/2024 03:56 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER FILED. The district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). Within 35 days, appellant must: (1) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). If appellant files a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous, or any other response other than a motion to dismiss, the court will determine whether the appeal is frivolous. If it is frivolous, the appeal will be dismissed. If it is not frivolous, the appeal will proceed. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Briefing is stayed. If appellant does not respond to this order, the court may dismiss this appeal without further notice. [Entered: 12/09/2024 02:04 PM]
|
| Filing 3 REFERRAL NOTICE. This matter is referred to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of forma pauperis status is appropriate where district court finds the appeal to be frivolous). If the district court elects to revoke in forma pauperis status, the district court is requested to notify this court and the parties of such determination within 21 days of the date of this referral. If the district court does not revoke in forma pauperis status, such status will continue automatically for this appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). This referral shall not affect the briefing schedule previously established by this court. [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/16/2024. For appeal no. 24-6695, 2:23-cv-01812-JCC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/04/2024 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-01812-JCC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6695 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2024 09:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
