Shell Energy North America US, L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
| SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA US, L.P. |
| FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| 24-6696 |
| November 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. The request to consolidate petition No. 24-6696 with Nos. 15-70511, 21- 71418, 24-1087, 24-1389, 24-3767, 24-3896, and 24-5084 is granted. These petitions are administratively closed. [24-6696, 24-1087, 24-1389, 24-3767, 24-3896, 24-5084, 24-5084] [Entered: 12/17/2024 09:23 AM]
|
| Filing 9 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [Entered: 11/21/2024 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Jared Fish [Entered: 11/18/2024 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jared Fish for Respondent Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. [Entered: 11/18/2024 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER: By 11/20/2024, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [Entered: 11/14/2024 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Petitioner Shell Energy North America US, L.P.. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 11/12/2024 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 4 STATUS REPORT filed by Petitioner Shell Energy North America US, L.P.. [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Petitioner) 11/12/2024, Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 1/23/2025, Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 2/24/2025. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 11/04/2024 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/3/2024. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6696 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2024 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Shell Energy North America US, L.P.. [Entered: 11/04/2024 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
