American Encore, et al. v. Fontes, et al.
Plaintiff: AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE, a non-profit corporation, AMERICAN ENCORE, an Arizona non-profit corporation and KAREN GLENNON, an Arizona individual
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General and KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Governor of Arizona
Case Number: 24-6703
Filed: November 4, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 16, 2025 AMERICAN ENCORE, ET AL. V. FONTES, ET AL.
September 16, 2025 Summary AMERICAN ENCORE V. FONTES

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER FILED. Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 3) for an extension of time to file the opening briefs is granted. The opening briefs are due January 6, 2025. The answering brief is due February 5, 2025. The optional reply briefs are due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 11/19/2024 04:02 PM]
November 15, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Transcript Designation filed by Appellee American Encore, Appellee Karen Glennon, Appellee America First Policy Institute. [Entered: 11/15/2024 11:39 AM]
November 14, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant Kris Mayes. [Entered: 11/14/2024 12:53 PM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 2 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION SCHEDULE NOTICE. Preliminary Injunction Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 12/2/2024, Preliminary Injunction Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 12/30/2024. For appeal no. 24-6703, 2:24-cv-01673-MTL.All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:18 PM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:24-cv-01673-MTL has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6703 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: American Encore, et al. v. Fontes, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMERICA FIRST POLICY INSTITUTE, a non-profit corporation
Represented By: Michael D. Berry
Represented By: Drew C Ensign
Represented By: Mr. Dallin Holt
Represented By: Mr. Brennan Bowen
Represented By: Andrew Gould
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMERICAN ENCORE, an Arizona non-profit corporation
Represented By: Michael D. Berry
Represented By: Drew C Ensign
Represented By: Mr. Dallin Holt
Represented By: Mr. Brennan Bowen
Represented By: Andrew Gould
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KAREN GLENNON, an Arizona individual
Represented By: Michael D. Berry
Represented By: Drew C Ensign
Represented By: Mr. Dallin Holt
Represented By: Mr. Brennan Bowen
Represented By: Andrew Gould
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State
Represented By: Kara Marie Karlson
Represented By: Karen Hartman-Tellez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KRIS MAYES, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General
Represented By: Luci Danielle Davis
Represented By: Joshua M. Whitaker
Represented By: Nathan T. Arrowsmith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KATIE HOBBS, in her official capacity as Governor of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?