Tristan, et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
Plaintiff: AVANTIKA AHUJA, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, NATALIE TRISTAN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and PHILLIP MYERS
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC, doing business as Zellepay.com
Case Number: 24-6704
Filed: November 4, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 3, 2024 Filing 5 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 1/15/2025. The briefing schedule is amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/18/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/20/2025, Optional reply brief due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 12/03/2024 02:15 PM]
November 21, 2024 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 12/03/2024, 8:30 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 11/21/2024 10:25 AM]
November 12, 2024 Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Natalie Tristan, Appellant Phillip Myers. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 11/12/2024 01:28 PM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 11/12/2024, Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 11/12/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 12/12/2024, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 1/21/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 2/20/2025. For appeal no. 24-6704, 8:22-cv-01183-DOC-ADS. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:37 PM]
November 4, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 8:22-cv-01183-DOC-ADS has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6704 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:34 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tristan, et al. v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AVANTIKA AHUJA, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NATALIE TRISTAN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Represented By: Ms. Sophia Goren Gold, AT
Represented By: Abbas Kazerounian
Represented By: Nathan Nanfelt
Represented By: Laura R. Gerber
Represented By: Mr. Jeffrey D. Kaliel
Represented By: Jason Ibey
Represented By: Derek W. Loeser
Represented By: Mr. Chris N. Ryder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PHILLIP MYERS
Represented By: Ms. Sophia Goren Gold, AT
Represented By: Abbas Kazerounian
Represented By: Nathan Nanfelt
Represented By: Laura R. Gerber
Represented By: Mr. Jeffrey D. Kaliel
Represented By: Jason Ibey
Represented By: Derek W. Loeser
Represented By: Mr. Chris N. Ryder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Represented By: Mr. Noah A. Levine
Represented By: Matthew Benedetto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EARLY WARNING SERVICES, LLC, doing business as Zellepay.com
Represented By: Mr. David Wesley Moon
Represented By: Julia Strickland
Represented By: Mr. Christopher R. Fredrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?