Dashiell, et al. v. County of Stevens, et al.
| GLENDA A. DASHIELL, husband and wife, STEVEN LYNN PARKER, DONALD L. DASHIELL, PAMELA JOYCE MCCART, husband and wife, ANTOINETTE LYNN PARKER, husband and wife and WESLEY LEWIS MCCART |
| COUNTY OF STEVENS, municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of Washington and TIM RASMUSSEN, both in his official capacity as Stevens County Prosecutor and individually |
| 24-6750 |
| November 6, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED (text only) - DIAL-IN Mediation Conference Call 1/8/2025, 8:30 am Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in instructions. Briefing schedule amended as follows: Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/10/2025, Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/12/2025, Optional reply brief due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [Entered: 12/16/2024 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Mediation Appellant Status Report due 12/20/2024. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 12/16/2024 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 12/2/2024, 8:30 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 11/21/2024 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Appellant Donald L. Dashiell, Appellant Glenda A. Dashiell, Appellant Wesley Lewis McCart, Appellant Pamela Joyce McCart, Appellant Steven Lynn Parker, Appellant Antoinette Lynn Parker. [COURT UPDATE: Attached flattened PDF of mediation questionnaire.] To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #[email protected] and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 11/12/2024 03:02 PM] [Edited: 11/12/2024 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 11/12/2024, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/16/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 1/15/2025. For appeal no. 24-6750, 2:23-cv-00239-MKD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/06/2024 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-00239-MKD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6750 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/06/2024 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
