Baker v. Gamboa
Petitioner: ADAM RANDY BAKER
Respondent: MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden at Avenal State Pirson
Case Number: 24-6751
Filed: November 6, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Appellants motion for an extension of time (Docket Entry No. 8) to file a request for a certificate of appealability (COA) is granted. Any request for a COA is due by February 5, 2025. [Entered: 12/10/2024 10:10 AM]
December 4, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION to Extend Time to File Motion filed by Appellant Adam Randy Baker. [Entered: 12/04/2024 03:01 PM]
December 4, 2024 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Tarik S. Adlai for Appellant Adam Randy Baker. [Entered: 12/04/2024 07:35 AM]
December 4, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tarik S. Adlai for Appellant Adam Randy Baker replacing Aaron Spolin. [Entered: 12/03/2024 05:10 PM]
November 22, 2024 Filing 5 TERMINATED participation of representing . [Entered: 11/22/2024 01:22 PM]
November 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. Aaron Spolins motion (Docket Entry No. 3) to withdraw as appellants counsel of record is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). The Clerk will serve a copy of this order on appellant Adam Baker (CDCR No. AR3345), at Avenal State Prison, Housing: 530-3-5, P.O. Box 905, Avenal, CA 93204, and will update the docket to reflect that appellant is proceeding pro se. [Entered: 11/22/2024 01:20 PM]
November 20, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Aaron Spolin for Appellant Adam Randy Baker. [Entered: 11/20/2024 10:13 AM]
November 6, 2024 Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 10/21/2024. [Entered: 11/06/2024 10:48 AM]
November 6, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 8:22-cv-00806-KK-SSC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6751 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/06/2024 10:46 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Baker v. Gamboa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MARTIN GAMBOA, Warden at Avenal State Pirson
Represented By: Matthew Mulford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ADAM RANDY BAKER
Represented By: Aaron Spolin
Represented By: Tarik S. Adlai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?