Anderson v. Ross, et al.
Petitioner: DEVON JOSEPH ANDERSON
Respondent: RAUL LABRADOR, Attorney General and RUSSELL ROSS
Case Number: 24-6793
Filed: November 7, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. On December 19, 2024, the district court resolved the post-judgment motion. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 5) to lift the stay of proceedings is therefore granted and this appeal will proceed. [Entered: 01/03/2025 09:03 AM]
December 26, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION to Lift Stay of Proceedings filed by Appellant Devon Joseph Anderson. [Entered: 12/26/2024 03:42 PM]
December 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. Proceedings in this court are stayed until the district court rules on the timely tolling motion filed on October 29, 2024. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). The clerk will send a copy of this order to the district judge. [Entered: 12/10/2024 12:18 PM]
November 25, 2024 Filing 3 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Devon Joseph Anderson. [Entered: 11/26/2024 10:41 AM]
November 7, 2024 Filing 2 COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 10/25/2024. [Entered: 11/07/2024 03:46 PM]
November 7, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 1:23-cv-00500-DKG has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6793 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/07/2024 03:44 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Anderson v. Ross, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: RAUL LABRADOR, Attorney General
Represented By: Mark William Olson
Represented By: Mr. L. LaMont Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: RUSSELL ROSS
Represented By: Mark William Olson
Represented By: Mr. L. LaMont Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DEVON JOSEPH ANDERSON
Represented By: Devon Joseph Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?